WIT

Assessing the Validity of Wipro (WIT)’s Bearish Ratings


Its shares falling by -12.4% today, Wipro seems to be confirming what most analysts are saying about the stock. Despite its average rating of underperform, might the stock be attractive to long term value investors? Let's unpack some of the company's fundamentals to find out.

Let's start our value analysis with the price to book (P/B) ratio. This is perhaps the most basic measure of a company's valuation, which is its market value divided by its book value. Book value refers to the sum of all of the company's tangible assets minus its liabilities -- you can also think of it as the company's equity value.

Traditionally, value investors would look for companies with a ratio of less than 1 (meaning that the market value was smaller than the company's book value), but such opportunities are very rare these days. So we tend to look for company's whose valuations are less than their sector and market average. The P/B ratio for Wipro is 0.04, compared to its sector average of 4.11 and the S&P500's average P/B of 4.71.

The most common metric for valuing a company is its Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio. It's simply today's stock price of 6.04 divided by either its trailing or forward earnings, which for Wipro are $0.25 and $0.29 respectively. Based on these values, the company's trailing P/E ratio is 24.1 and its forward P/E ratio is 20.8. By way of comparison, the average P/E ratio of the Technology sector is 31.58 and the average P/E ratio of the S&P 500 is 28.21.

The problem with P/E ratios is that they don't take into account the growth of earnings. This means that a company with a higher than average P/E ratio may still be undervalued if it has extremely high projected earnings growth. Conversely, a company with a low P/E ratio may not present a good value if its projected earnings are stagnant.

When we divide Wipro's P/E ratio by its projected 5 year earnings growth rate, we obtain its Price to Earnings Growth (PEG) ratio of 4.73. A PEG ratio of 1 or less may indicate the company is undervalued in terms of its growth potential. On the other hand, a PEG ratio higher than 1 could indicate that investors are paying too high a premium for these growth levels. Bear in mind, however, that the 5 year earnings growth estimate could very well be an over or underestimate!

Indebted or mismanaged companies can't sustain shareholder value for long, even if they have strong earnings. For this reason, considering Wipro's ability to meet its debt obligations is an important aspect of its valuation. By adding up its current assets, then subtracting its inventory and prepaid expenses, and then dividing the whole by its current liabilities, we obtain the company's Quick Ratio of 2.434. Since WIT's quick ratio is higher than 1, its total liquid assets are sufficient to meets its current liabilities.

One last metric to check out is Wipro's free cash flow of $2.11 Billion. This represents the total sum of all the company's inflows and outflows of capital, including the costs of servicing its debt. It's the final bottom line of the company, which it can use to re-invest or to pay its investors a dividend. With such healthy cash flows, investors can expect Wipro to keep paying its 14.5% dividend.

In conclusion, Wipro may hold more intrinsic value than analysts give it credit for. If analysts are unenthused about the stock despite its attractive valuation, it is likely due to their perception of limited growth potential, as evidenced by its elevated PEG ratio. We will keep following WIT to see whether the value or growth thesis prevails.

The above analysis is intended for educational purposes only and was performed on the basis of publicly available data. It is not to be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Any buy, sell, or other recommendations mentioned in the article are direct quotations of consensus recommendations from the analysts covering the stock, and do not represent the opinions of Market Inference or its writers. Past performance, accounting data, and inferences about market position and corporate valuation are not reliable indicators of future price movements. Market Inference does not provide financial advice. Investors should conduct their own review and analysis of any company of interest before making an investment decision.

IN FOCUS