It's Time For a Quick Look at Duke Energy (DUK)'s Fundamentals

Based on the factors that Benjamin Graham considered in analyzing potential stock picks, Duke Energy is not a quality investment. Only investors with a high risk tolerance and a solid investment thesis on the stock will be interested in this large-cap Utilities company.

Duke Energy Is Probably Overvalued

Graham devised the below equation to give investors a quick way of determining whether a stock is trading at a fair multiple of its earnings and its assets:

√(22.5 * 5 year average earnings per share (3.79) * 5 year average book value per share (61.51) = $72.42

At today's price of $94.37 per share, Duke Energy is now trading 30.31% above the maximum price that Graham would have wanted to pay for the stock.

Even though the stock does not trade at an attractive multiple, it might still meet some of the other criteria for quality stocks that Graham listed in Chapter 14 of The Intelligent Investor.

Positive Retained Earnings From 2008 To 2022, A Solid Record Of Dividends, and Decreasing Earnings Per Share

Ben Graham wrote that an investment in a company with a record of positive retained earnings could contribute significantly to the margin of safety. Duke Energy had positive retained earnings from 2008 to 2022 with an average of $2.4 Billion over this period.

Another one of Graham's requirements is for a 30% or more cumulative growth rate of the company's earnings per share over the last ten years.We are going to compare Duke Energy's earnings per share averages from the two 'bookends' of the 16 year period for which we have data. The first bookend comprises the years 2007, 2008, and 2009, whose EPS values of $1.18, $1.07, and $0.26 average out to $0.84. Next we look at the years 2020, 2021, and 2022, whose values of $1.72, $0.93, and $-0.86 average out to $0.60. The growth rate between the two averages does not meet Graham's standard since it is -28.57%.

Duke Energy has offered a regular dividend since at least 2007. The company has returned a 4.39% dividend yield over the last 12 months.

Negative Current Asset to Liabilities Balance and Not Enough Current Assets to Cover Liabilities

Graham sought companies with extremely low debt levels compared to their assets. For one, he expected their current ratio to be over 2 and their long term debt to net current asset ratio to be near, or ideally under, under 1. Duke Energy fails on both counts with a current ratio of 0.7 and a negative net current asset level.

According to Graham's analysis, Duke Energy is likely a company of low quality, which is trading far above its fair price.

2019-12-31 2020-12-31 2021-12-31 2022-12-31
Revenue (k) $22,144,000 $21,706,000 $22,817,000 $26,329,000
Gross Margins 60.0% 36.32% 66.74% 70.49%
Operating Margins 25.78% 21.06% 24.1% 22.83%
Net Margins 16.93% 6.34% 17.13% 9.69%
Net Margins Growth n/a -62.55% 170.19% -43.43%
Earnings Per Share $5.11 $1.79 $5.08 $3.31
Diluted Shares (k) 733,000 769,000 769,000 770,000
Free Cash Flow (k) -$2,913,000 -$1,051,000 -$1,425,000 -$5,440,000
Capital Expenditures (k) $11,122,000 $9,907,000 $9,715,000 $11,367,000
Net Current Assets (k) -$102,853,000 -$105,742,000 -$110,351,000 -$115,542,000
Current Ratio 0.62 0.53 0.62 0.7
Long Term Debt (k) 58,126,000 59,863,000 63,835,000 71,215,000
Net Debt / EBITDA 9.26 18.25 10.12 13.74
The above analysis is intended for educational purposes only and was performed on the basis of publicly available data. It is not to be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Any buy, sell, or other recommendations mentioned in the article are direct quotations of consensus recommendations from the analysts covering the stock, and do not represent the opinions of Market Inference or its writers. Past performance, accounting data, and inferences about market position and corporate valuation are not reliable indicators of future price movements. Market Inference does not provide financial advice. Investors should conduct their own review and analysis of any company of interest before making an investment decision.