Graham-Style Analysis of Cisco Systems (CSCO)

Cisco Systems does not have the profile of a defensive investment based on the requirements of Ben Graham. The Communication Equipment firm may nonetheless be of interest to more risk-oriented investors who have a solid thesis on the company's future growth. At Market Inference, we remain agnostic as to such further developments, and prefer to use a company's past track record as the bellwether for future potential gains.

Cisco Systems Is Probably Overvalued

Graham devised the below equation to give investors a quick way of determining whether a stock is trading at a fair multiple of its earnings and its assets:

√(22.5 * 3 year average earnings per share (2.64) * 3 year average book value per share (10.379) = $24.83

At today's price of $55.06 per share, Cisco Systems is now trading 121.7% above the maximum price that Graham would have wanted to pay for the stock.

Even though the stock does not trade at an attractive multiple, it might still meet some of the other criteria for quality stocks that Graham listed in Chapter 14 of The Intelligent Investor.

Negative Retained Earnings In 2019, 2020, And 2021, A Solid Record Of Dividends, and Eps Growth In Excess Of Graham'S Requirements

Ben Graham wrote that an investment in a company with a record of positive retained earnings could contribute significantly to the margin of safety. However, Cisco Systems had negative retained earnings in 2019, 2020, and 2021 with an average of $7.82 Billion over this period. Cisco Systems’s ongoing share buybacks are contributing significantly to its EPS growth, but we can also see that its net income is growing in line with its revenues, and that its profitability is stable. In other words, the company isn’t trying to hide a decline in its business operations.

Another one of Graham's requirements is for a 30% or more cumulative growth rate of the company's earnings per share over the last ten years.To determine Cisco Systems's EPS growth over time, we will average out its EPS for 2008, 2009, and 2010, which were $0.37, $0.30, and $0.34 respectively. This gives us an average of $0.34 for the period of 2008 to 2010. Next, we compare this value with the average EPS reported in 2020, 2021, and 2022, which were $2.64, $2.50, and $2.82, for an average of $2.65. Now we see that Cisco Systems's EPS growth was 679.41% during this period, which satisfies Ben Graham's requirement.

Cisco Systems has offered a regular dividend since at least 2011. The company has returned an average dividend yield of 3.0% over the last five years.

Negative Current Asset to Liabilities Balance and an Average Current Ratio

Graham sought companies with extremely low debt levels compared to their assets. For one, he expected their current ratio to be over 2 and their long term debt to net current asset ratio to be near, or ideally under, under 1. Cisco Systems fails on both counts with a current ratio of 1.4 and a debt to net current asset ratio of -0.5.

Conclusion

According to Graham's analysis, Cisco Systems is likely a company of average quality, which does not offer a significant enough margin of safety for a risk averse investor.

2020-07-31 2021-07-31 2022-07-31
Revenue (MM) $49,301 $49,818 $51,557
Gross Margins 64.3% 64.0% 62.6%
Operating Margins 28.6% 27.5% 27.1%
Net Margins 22.75% 21.26% 22.91%
Net Income (MM) $11,214 $10,591 $11,812
Net Interest Expense (MM) $335 $184 $116
Depreciation & Amort. (MM) -$1,808 -$1,862 -$1,957
Earnings Per Share $2.64 $2.5 $2.79
EPS Growth n/a -5.3% 11.6%
Diluted Shares (MM) 4,254 4,236 4,075
Free Cash Flow (MM) $14,656 $14,762 $12,749
Capital Expenditures (MM) -$770 -$692 -$477
Net Current Assets (MM) -$13,360 -$17,110 -$17,512
Current Ratio 1.72 1.49 1.43
Long Term Debt (MM) $11,578 $9,018 $8,416
Net Debt / EBITDA 0.17 0.15 0.15
The above analysis is intended for educational purposes only and was performed on the basis of publicly available data. It is not to be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Any buy, sell, or other recommendations mentioned in the article are direct quotations of consensus recommendations from the analysts covering the stock, and do not represent the opinions of Market Inference or its writers. Past performance, accounting data, and inferences about market position and corporate valuation are not reliable indicators of future price movements. Market Inference does not provide financial advice. Investors should conduct their own review and analysis of any company of interest before making an investment decision.

IN FOCUS