The best investors are not afraid to go against the grain. And an investment in Gold Fields, which has an average analyst rating of only hold, would certainly fit the bill. Might patient investors be able to find value in this stock? Let's dive into numbers and see for ourselves.
Over the last year, Gold Fields shares have moved 4.2% while trading between the prices of $10.31 and $18.97. This represents a -19.9% difference compared to the S&P 500, which moved 24.2% over the last 52 weeks.
At its current price of $16.02 per share, GFI has a trailing price to earnings (P/E) ratio of 20.3 based on its 12 month trailing earnings per share of $0.79. Considering its future earnings estimates of $1.85 per share, the stock's forward P/E ratio is 8.7. In comparison, the average P/E ratio of the Basic Materials sector is 22.71 and the average P/E ratio of the S&P 500 is 27.65.
Gold Fields's P/E ratio tells us how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of the company's earnings. The problem with this metric is that it doesn't take into account the expected growth in earnings of the stock. We can solve this problem by dividing the trailing P/E ratio by the company's five year earnings growth estimate, which in this case gives us a 1.58 Price to Earnings Growth (PEG) ratio.
A PEG ratio between 0 and 1 indicates a potentially undervalued stock. This metric is useful because some companies have a low P/E ratio for a reason: there is no earnings growth potential in the stock. Other companies may have high P/E ratios, but may still be undervalued if they have very high expected earnings growth rates. The main caveat with the PEG ratio is that it relies on the company's earnings growth estimates, which are potentially subject to manipulation.
We can also compare the ratio of Gold Fields's price to its book value. A company's book value refers to its present equity value: what is left when we subtract its liabilities from its assets. GFI has a book value of 3.2, with anything close or below one indicating a potentially undervalued company.
A comparison of the share price versus company earnings and book value should be balanced by an analysis of the company's ability to pay its liabilities. One popular metric is the Quick Ratio, or Acid Test, which is the company's current assets minus its inventory and prepaid expenses divided by its current liabilities. Gold Fields's quick ratio is 0.563. Generally speaking, a quick ratio above 1 signifies that the company is able to meet its liabilities.
The final element of our analysis will touch on Gold Fields's capacity to generate cash for the benefit of its shareholders or for reinvesting in the business. For this, we look at the company's levered free cash flow, which is the sum of all incoming and outgoing cash flows, including the servicing of current debt and liabilities. Gold Fields has a free cash flow of $1.19 Billion, which it uses to pay its shareholders a 2.5% dividend.
By most metrics, Gold Fields is an undervalued stock. So why are analysts giving it a low rating? It probably has to do with their perception of its limited growth potential, as represented by its elevated PEG ratio. For growth-oriented investors, GFI is cheap for a reason. On the other hand, diehard value investors believe that if you wait long enough an undervalued stock will always reach a fair valuation. We will continue to monitor the stock to see which thesis prevails.
