# Running Cisco Systems (CSCO) Through the Ben Graham Analysis

Many investors turn to Benjamin Graham's so-called “Graham number” to calculate the fair price of a stock. The Graham number is √(22.5 * earnings per share * book value per share), which for Cisco Systems gives us a fair price of \$24.15. In comparison, the stock’s market price is \$47.54 per share. Therefore, Cisco Systems’s market price exceeds the upper bound that a prudent investor would pay for its shares by 96.9%.

The Graham number is often used in isolation, but in fact it is only one part of a check list for choosing defensive stocks that he laid out in Chapter 14 of The Intelligent Investor. The analysis requires us to look at the following fundamentals of Cisco Systems:

### Sales Revenue Should Be No Less Than \$500 million

For Cisco Systems, average sales revenue over the last 4 years has been \$50,645,000,000, so in the context of the Graham analysis the stock has impressive sales revenue. Originally the threshold was \$100 million, but since the book was published in the 1970s it's necessary to adjust the figure for inflation.

### Current Assets Should Be at Least Twice Current Liabilities

We calculate Cisco Systems's current ratio by dividing its total current assets of \$36,717,000,000 by its total current liabilities of \$25,640,000,000. Current assets refer to company assets that can be transferred into cash within one year, such as accounts receivable, inventory, and liquid financial instruments. Current liabilities, on the other hand, refer to those that will come due within one year. Cisco Systems’s current assets outweigh its current liabilities by a factor of 1.4 only.

### The Company’s Long-term Debt Should Not Exceed its Net Current Assets

This means that its ratio of debt to net current assets should be 1 or less. Since Cisco Systems’s debt ratio is 0.8, the company has healthy debt levels. We calculate Cisco Systems’s debt to net current assets ratio by dividing its total long term of debt of \$8,416,000,000 by its current assets minus total current liabilities.

### The Stock Should Have a Positive Level of Retained Earnings Over Several Years

Cisco Systems had negative retained earnings in 2019, 2020, and 2021, during which time they averaged \$-2,659,750,000. Retained earnings are the sum of the current and previous reporting periods' net asset amounts, minus all dividend payments. It's a similar metric to free cash flow, with the difference that retained earnings are accounted for on an accrual basis.

### There Should Be a Record of Uninterrupted Dividend Payments Over the Last 20 Years

Cisco Systems has offered a regular dividend since at least 2011, returning an average yield of 2.9% over the last five years.

### A Minimum Increase of at Least One-third in Earnings per Share (EPS) Over the Past 10 Years

To determine Cisco Systems's EPS growth over time, we will average out its EPS for 2008, 2009, and 2010, which were \$0.37, \$0.30, and \$0.34 respectively. This gives us an average of \$0.34 for the period of 2008 to 2010. Next, we compare this value with the average EPS reported in 2020, 2021, and 2022, which were \$0.62, \$2.50, and \$2.82, for an average of \$1.98. Now we see that Cisco Systems's EPS growth was 482.35% during this period, which satisfies Ben Graham's requirement.

It may be trading far above its fair value and have a record of negative retained earnings, but Cisco Systems satisfies most of the other criteria Benjamin Graham used for identifying for an undervalued stock because it has:

• impressive sales revenue
• a decent current ratio
• healthy debt levels
• a solid record of dividends
• EPS growth in excess of Graham's requirements
The above analysis is intended for educational purposes only and was performed on the basis of publicly available data. It is not to be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Any buy, sell, or other recommendations mentioned in the article are direct quotations of consensus recommendations from the analysts covering the stock, and do not represent the opinions of Market Inference or its writers. Past performance, accounting data, and inferences about market position and corporate valuation are not reliable indicators of future price movements. Market Inference does not provide financial advice. Investors should conduct their own review and analysis of any company of interest before making an investment decision.